فصلنامه مطالعات توسعه پایدار شهری و منطقه ای

برنامه‌ریزی یکپارچه توسعه روستایی مبتنی بر کشاورزی هوشمند و مدیریت چرخه‌ای منابع کشاورزی(مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان خرم‌آباد)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سجاد بازوند 1
آیت اله بختیاری 2
رضا پیروز 3

1 استادیار پژوهشی، بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی اجتماعی، مرکز تحقیقات آموزشی کشاورزی منابع طبیعی لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی خرم آباد، ایران.

2 مربی آموزشی، بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی، اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز آموزش عالی امام خمینی (ره)، سازمان تحقیقات ، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران.

3 کارشناس ارشد اصلاح و بذر،مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، خرم آباد، ایران.

چکیده
زمینه و هدف: چالش‌های اقتصادی، نهادی و زیست‌محیطی روستاهای کشور، ضرورت گذار از رویکردهای بخشی به سمت برنامه‌ریزی یکپارچه توسعه روستایی را برجسته ساخته است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی وضعیت مدیریت منابع آب و خاک، کشاورزی هوشمند و مدیریت چرخه‌ای منابع و پسماندهای کشاورزی در چارچوب اقتصاد چرخشی و تحلیل نقش آن‌ها در برنامه‌ریزی یکپارچه توسعه روستایی و تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی روستاهای شهرستان خرم‌آباد انجام شد.
روش شناسی: روش پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از حیث روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری شامل 15870 نفر از بهره‌برداران و فعالان بخش کشاورزی بود که حجم نمونه 375 نفر به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای متناسب انتخاب شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون تی تک‌نمونه‌ای، آزمون فریدمن، رگرسیون خطی و روش بوت‌استرپ استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها و نتایج: نتایج آزمون تی تک‌نمونه‌ای نشان داد میانگین مدیریت منابع آب و خاک 910/2 و مدیریت چرخه‌ای منابع و پسماندهای کشاورزی 680/2 بوده و در سطحی پایین‌تر از حد مطلوب قرار دارند، در حالی که میانگین کشاورزی هوشمند 090/3 در سطح نسبتاً مطلوب ارزیابی شد. نتایج آزمون فریدمن نشان داد ضعف هماهنگی نهادی با میانگین رتبه 923/4 مهم‌ترین مانع و حمایت و سیاست‌های دولت با میانگین رتبه 812/4 مهم‌ترین پیشران شناسایی شد. نتایج تحلیل بوت‌استرپ نشان داد کشاورزی هوشمند تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر برنامه‌ریزی یکپارچه توسعه روستایی دارد و مدیریت چرخه‌ای منابع و پسماندهای کشاورزی نیز در این رابطه نقش میانجی جزئی ایفا می‌کند. همچنین نتایج رگرسیون خطی ساده بیانگر آن است که برنامه‌ریزی یکپارچه توسعه روستایی با ضریب بتا 447/0 نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در ارتقای تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی روستاها ایفا می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

"برنامه‌ریزی یکپارچه توسعه روستایی"
" تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی روستاها"
" کشاورزی هوشمند"
" مدیریت چرخه‌ای منابع و پسماندهای کشاورزی"
" شهرستان خرم‌آباد"
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Integrated Rural Development Planning Based on Smart Agriculture and Circular Management of Agricultural Resources (Case Study: Rural Areas in Khorramabad Township)

نویسندگان English

Sajjad Bazvand 1
Ayatollah Bakhtiari 2
Reza Pirooz 3
1 Research Assistant Professor, Social Economic Research Department, Lorestan Natural Resources Agricultural Educational Research Center, Khorramabad Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization, Iran.
2 Educational Trainer, Economic, Social Research and Agricultural Extension Department, Imam Khomeini Higher Education Center (RA), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran.
3 MSc in Plant Breeding, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده English

Background and Objective: The economic, institutional, and environmental challenges facing rural areas in Iran have highlighted the necessity of shifting from sectoral approaches toward integrated rural development planning. The present study aimed to evaluate the status of water and soil resource management, smart agriculture, and the circular management of resources and agricultural waste within the framework of the circular economy, and to analyze their role in integrated rural development planning as well as in enhancing the economic and environmental resilience of rural settlements in Khorramabad Township.
Methodology: In terms of purpose, this study is applied, and in terms of methodology, it follows a descriptive–analytical approach. The statistical population consisted of 15,870 agricultural beneficiaries and stakeholders, from among whom a sample of 375 individuals was selected using proportionate stratified random sampling. Data were analyzed using the one-sample t-test, Friedman test, linear regression, and the bootstrap method.
Results and Findings: The results of the one-sample t-test showed that the mean scores for water and soil resource management and the circular management of resources and agricultural waste were 2.910 and 2.680, respectively, both falling below the desirable level; whereas the mean score for smart agriculture was 3.090, indicating a relatively desirable status. The results of the Friedman test indicated that weak institutional coordination, with a mean rank of 4.923, was identified as the most important barrier, while government support and policies, with a mean rank of 4.812, were recognized as the most important driver. The bootstrap analysis revealed that smart agriculture has a positive and significant effect on integrated rural development planning, and that the circular management of resources and agricultural waste plays a partial mediating role in this relationship. Moreover, the results of simple linear regression indicated that integrated rural development planning, with a beta coefficient of 0.447, plays a decisive role in enhancing the economic and environmental resilience of rural settlements.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Integrated Rural Development Planning
Economic and Environmental Rural Resilience
Smart Agriculture
Circular Management of Agricultural Resources and Waste
Khorramabad Township.
1.    Abbasi, M., & Chaharrahi, Z. (2026). Analysis of factors affecting development inefficiency: A spatial planning approach (Case study: Ilam Province). Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 7(3), 266–278. https://www.srds.ir/article_243950_1864fd8c5a74c504ccc842322dbcc404.pdf
2.    Abdali Ghalaei,N . (2023). Modeling the role of geographic factors in the distribution of gastrointestinal cancer in Lorestan province. Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 4(3), 1-16. [In Persian]https://www.srds.ir/article_183948.html?lang=en
3.    Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., & Montalba, R. (2024). Agroecological resilience and ecosystem-based agriculture in the face of climate change. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 44(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00894-1
4.    Baffoe, G., & Matsuda, H. (2021). An empirical assessment of rural resilience and sustainable livelihoods. Sustainability, 13(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042103
5.    Baffoe, G., Matsuda, H., & Toyoda, J. (2023). Rural resilience and sustainable livelihoods under environmental and economic shocks. Journal of Rural Studies, 98, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.02.004
6.    Bahmanzadeh, K., Haji Rahimi, M., & Ghaderzadeh, H. (2025). Identification and analysis of barriers to the development of the circular economy in the agricultural sector of Kurdistan Province. Journal of Agricultural and Rural Economics, 2(3), 23–44.[In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30490/etr.2025.367305.1036
7.    D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., et al. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
8.    D’Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., & Toppinen, A. (2023). Towards a circular bioeconomy: Drivers, challenges and opportunities in rural regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135214
9.    Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2024). Circular economy in food systems: Scaling local loops for resilience. Cowes, UK: Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/food/overview
10. European Commission. (2023). Rural innovation ecosystems and smart villages in the EU. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/742615
11. FAO. (2022). The state of food and agriculture 2022: Leveraging automation in agriculture for transforming agrifood systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2459en
12. FAO. (2023). Agroecosystems and sustainable agricultural development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.  https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc7096en
13. FAO. (2023). Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook (Updated ed.). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook/en/
14. FAO. (2025). Smart and circular agriculture for resilient rural development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9154en
15. Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2024). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 29(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15012-290112
16. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
17. Hakimi, H. (2023). Vertical farming as a smart agricultural solution to the land crisis. Journal of Agricultural Information Science and Technology, 10, 11–19. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.1085/361667.2023.JAIST.22092.1
18. Hatami,H , Moradi,N and Qaisundi,M . (2024). Locating fire stations with AHP Fuzzy model in GIS environment (case study: Khorramabad city). Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 5(4), 130-144. [In Persian].https://www.srds.ir/article_209447.html?lang=en
19. Healey, P. (2024). Integrated spatial and rural planning: New directions for sustainable development. Planning Theory & Practice, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2278146
20. IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
21. Jafarzadeh, M. (2025). Assessing strategic entrepreneurship with a circular economy approach in construction projects. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 17(4), 145–182. [In persian].  https://doi.org/10.22059/JED.2025.389111.654479
22. Kirchherr, J., & Piscicelli, L. (2023). Towards a circular economy: A systematic review of barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384, 135533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135533
23. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2023). Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the agricultural and rural sectors. Ecological Economics, 204, 107646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107646
24. Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. C. (2024). Dealing with the challenges of smart farming: Governance, innovation and social learning. Global Food Security, 40, 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100760
25. Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
26. Lorestan Governorate. (2022). Territorial planning of Lorestan Province and report on the economic and social status of Khorramabad Township. Khorramabad, Iran: Lorestan Governorate, Deputy of Planning and Development. [In Persian].
27. Ministry of Energy of Iran. (2023). Report on water resources status and drought conditions in western regions of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Energy. [In Persian].
28. Mohammadi, M., & Ma’dani Mallak, M. (2026). Evolution of rural housing policies in Iran (From pre-revolution to post-Islamic revolution). Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 7(3), 230–247. https://www.srds.ir/article_244382_abafabead41f9af93ecdcb20734bd29d.pdf
29. OECD. (2023). Rural development policy for the green transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9c6f29d9-en
30. OECD. (2024). Place-based approaches for rural innovation and resilience. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5c5c9a2b-en
31. OECD. (2025). Rural innovation for the circular bioeconomy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7f1c6c2e-en
32. Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., Flora, C. B., Godfray, H. C. J., et al. (2018). Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
33. Rezaei, F., Azizpour, F., Tahmasbi, A., & Hosseini Hasel, S. (2023). A conceptual framework for rural constellation development planning based on the perspectives of academic and executive experts. Journal of Physical Development Planning, 29, 1–14. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30473/psp.2023.62809.2577
34. Rose, D. C., & Chilvers, J. (2018). Agriculture 4.0: Broadening responsible innovation in an era of smart farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087
35. Rotz, S., Gravely, E., Mosby, I., Duncan, E., Finnis, E., Horgan, M., et al. (2019). Automated pastures and the digital divide in smart farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023
36. Scandura, A., & Calzolari, G. (2024). Smart technologies enabling circular economy transitions in agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122857
37. Scandura, A., & Calzolari, T. (2022). Smart agriculture, circular economy and rural development: An integrated framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.006
38. Shahrokhi,S Z , Sheikh-eslami,A and Jalili,M . (2026). Sustainable Regeneration of Historic Urban Fabrics: A Culture-Based Approach to Revitalizing Identity and Institutional Development (Case Study: Historic Fabric of Khorramabad City). Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 7(2), 578-603. [In Persian].https://www.srds.ir/article_248316.html?lang=en
39. Soleimanpour, M., & Norouzi, R. (2024). Examining the relationship between the circular economy and rural sustainable development with the mediating role of entrepreneurial empowerment. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 13(2), 83–96. [In Persian].  https://doi.org/10.30473/EE.2024.69674.268
40. Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). Lorestan Province statistical yearbook. Statistical Center of Iran. [In Persian].
41. UNDP. (2024). Digital transformation and inclusive rural development. New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/publications/digital-transformation-rural-development
42. UNDP. (2024). Integrated rural development and local sustainability pathways. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/publications/integrated-rural-development-2024
43. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). (2023). Land management challenges in dryland ecosystems. Bonn, Germany: UNCCD.
44. Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2023). Digitalization of agriculture: Impacts on smart farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 213, 103807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103807
45. World Bank. (2024). Circular economy and sustainable rural development: Policy pathways for resilience. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2054-3.

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 18 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 آذر 1405

صفحه اصلی

راهنمای نویسندگان

بیانیه به کارگیری هوش مصنوعی

ارسال مقاله

تماس با ما