Analysis of indices susceptible to the CPTED approach in urban spaces (case study: lands east of the historical Bazaar of Urmia)

Document Type : Origional Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Planning and Art, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Instructor Department, of Architecture, Azad University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract
Background and Objective: Crime as a social exclusion, despite the density and social cohesion in the creation of social spaces, due to the presence of defenseless and abandoned spaces, has penetrated the perception of public spaces users. From this point of view, the category of creating a sense of security in environmental design with the CPTED approach in urban public spaces, especially the taboos of historical contexts, is worthy of attention. In the meantime, historical markets, which are one of the centers of interactions and confrontations of citizens, should be included in urban policies to improve and recreate safe spaces.
Research Methodology: In this regard, the current research, with a practical approach with a mixed method (qualitative-quantitative) to answer the main question, "What is the efficiency of the process (CPTED) in the sense of security of the users of the spaces of the eastern historical bazaar of Urmia?" I investigated the lands east of the historical bazaar of Urmia. Thus, by randomly distributing the questionnaire to the statistical population of 110 activists, the answer of 86 people is accepted according to Cochran's formula.
Findings and Conclusion: The analysis done in SPSS software of the parameters of the first-generation CPTED approaches shows the impact of the territorialism variable with a value of 0.625 in the highest degree and management and maintenance with a value of 0.194 in the lowest degree. Therefore, the results indicate that the approach to the theory of broken windows and the theory of space crime in improving the lands east of the historical market of Urmia will be of interest in creating safe and sociable spaces. In this way, it provides suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Subjects


اوبن، اوژن. (1391)، ایران امروز. علی اصغر سعیدی تهران، انتشارات علم.
پورجعفر، محمدرضا، و پورجعفر، علی. (1390). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در وضعیت اقتصادی بازارهای سنتی در ایران. مدیریت شهری، 9(ویژه نامه)، 203-221.
رجبی، آزیتا. (1396). کاربرد نظریه CPTED در کاهش جرایم شهری. آمایش محیط، 10(38 )، 27-46.
شجاع دل، نادره. (1397). گزارشی بر وضع موجود بازار ارومیه و بخشهای منفک شده از آن در سده اخیر. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی معماری سبز. 4(12)، 37-44.
کریمی نژاد، شهره، فدائی قطبی، مریم، و کریمی نژاد، فاطمه (1398). تحلیل پارکهای شهری با رویکرد مقابله با جرم CPTED؛ مطالعه موردی: پارک ملت مهاباد. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی مطالعات طراحی شهری و پژوهشهای شهری. (5)8: 39-50.
کلانتری، محسن، حیدریان، مسعود، و محمودی، عاطفه. (1389). ایمن سازی فضای کالبدی شهرها در برابر بزهکاری با استفاده از راهبردهای پیشگیری جرم با طراحی محیطی. دانش انتظامی، 12(3 (مسلسل 48))، 51-74.
مرکز اسناد و آرشیو بنیاد ایران شناسی شعبه آذربایجان غربی. 1403.
وحدت، سلمان، و سجادزاده، حسن. (1397). بررسی و ارزیابی نقش هنر شهری در افزایش میزان حضور پذیری فضاهای عمومی با تأکید بر گرافیک شهری، نمونه موردی: پارک مردم همدان. دو فصلنامه پژوهش هنر. 6(11)، 25-38.
 Apeltauer, T., 2019. Protection of soft targets. Prague: Leges. ISBN 978-80-7502-427-5.
Awodiji, T. (2024). Effectiveness of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Principles in Urban Environments: A Case Study of New Mexico. Available at SSRN 4814471.
Bahrami, F., Mostofialmamaleki, R., & Saraei, M. H. (2017). Explaining the Role of Physical Indicators in Promoting the Security of Citizens Adopting a CPTED Approach (A Case Study of Isfahan, Zeinabayeh Worn Out Area). Geography and Urban Space Development4(1), 1-21.
Bannister, J., & Fyfe, N. (2001). Introduction: Fear and the city. Urban Studies38(5-6), 807-813.
Behzadfar, M., Abdi, F., & Mohammadi, M. (2013). Evaluation of the criteria in the first generation of CPTED approach on security of public space at Dehkade farahzad of Tehran based on ANP model. 5(10), 119–134.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol.55(1), 591-621.
Corcoran, J., Zahnow, R., Wickes, R., & Hipp, J. (2018). Neighborhood land use features, collective efficacy and local civic actions. Urban Studies55(11), 2372-2390.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2002). Analyzing organized crimes. Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges32, 41-63.
Cowling, B. J., Lau, L. L., Wu, P., Wong, H. W., Fang, V. J., Riley, S., & Nishiura, H. (2010). Entry screening to delay local transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1). BMC infectious diseases10, 1-4.
Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A review and current status of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature30(4), 393-412.
DeLisi, M., Drury, A. J., & Elbert, M. J. (2022). The p factor, crime, and criminal justice: A criminological study of Caspi et al.'s general psychopathology general theory. International journal of law and psychiatry81, 101773. 295-315.
Dorn, M. S. (2005). Safety by Design. College Planning and Management Springboro, OH, Media, Inc. 1105.
Fein, J. (2024). Slow Travel New Mexico: Unforgettable Personal Experiences in the Land of Enchantment. University of New Mexico Press.
Foster, S., Giles-Corti, B., & Knuiman, M. (2010). Neighborhood design and fear of crime: A social-ecological examination of the correlates of residents’ fear in new suburban housing developments. Health & place16(6), 1156-1165.
Garcia-Ramon, M. D., Ortiz, A., & Prats, M. (2004). Urban planning, gender and the use of public space in a peripheral neighborhood of Barcelona. Cities21(3), 215-223.
Gibson, V., & Johnson, D. (2016). CPTED, but not as we know it: Investigating the conflict of frameworks and terminology in crime prevention through environmental design. Security Journal29, 256-275.
Jeffery, C. R., & Zahm, D. L. (2017). Crime prevention through environmental design, opportunity theory, and rational choice models. In Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 323-350). Routledge.
Jin, A., Li, G., Nie, Q., Chen, N., Li, B., Wen, X., & Xue, Y. (2024). Reconstructing urban spatial blind areas in child trafficking: Insights from the internet video surveillance data. Cities150, 105026.73-81.
Kelling, G. L., & Wilson, J. Q. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic monthly249(3), 29-38.. Broken windows. Atlantic monthly249(3), 29-38.
Kornhauser, R. R. (1975). Social sources of delinquency: an appraisal of analytic models. The University of Chicago.
Kubalová, K., Ďurica, J., & Skýpalová, E. (2023). Protection of soft targets in correlation with the CPTED concept. Transportation Research Procedia74, 1374-1381.
Lanfear, C. C., Matsueda, R. L., & Beach, L. R. (2020). Broken windows, informal social control, and crime: Assessing causality in empirical studies. Annual review of criminology3(1), 97-120.
Lee, S., Lee, C., Nam, J. W., Moudon, A. V., & Mendoza, J. A. (2023). Street environments and crime around low-income and minority schools: Adopting an environmental audit tool to assess crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Landscape and Urban Planning232, 104676.148-155.
Maia, R. L., Guerreiro, M. J., Paulo, D., Azevedo, V., & Sani, A. I. (2024). Times and spaces of crime in the Historic Centre of Porto: Evidence from official data. Cities150, 105052.
Moore, D. P. (2000). Safe and Secure Schools. School Planning and Management. Springboro, OH, Media, Inc. 1105.
Nassauer, J. I., Webster, N. J., Sampson, N., & Li, J. (2021). Care and safety in neighborhood preferences for vacant lot greenspace in legacy cities. Landscape and Urban Planning214, 104156. 219-226.
Navarrete-Hernandez, P., Luneke, A., Truffello, R., & Fuentes, L. (2023). Planning for fear of crime reduction: assessing the impact of public space regeneration on safety perceptions in deprived neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning237, 104809.
Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Collier Books.
O'Brien, D. T., Farrell, C., & Welsh, B. C. (2019). Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the pathways from neighborhood disorder to resident health outcomes and behaviors. Social science & medicine228, 272-292.
Park, A. J., Spicer, V., Guterres, M., Brantingham, P. L., & Jenion, G. (2010, May). Testing perception of crime in a virtual environment. In 2010 IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics (pp. 7-12). IEEE.
Parnaby, P. (2006). Crime prevention through environmental design: Discourses of risk, social control, and a neo-liberal context. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice48(1), 1-30.
Piroozfar, P., Farr, E. R., Aboagye-Nimo, E., & Osei-Berchie, J. (2019). Crime prevention in urban spaces through environmental design: A critical UK perspective. Cities95, 102411.152-169.
Purpura, P. (2007). Security and loss prevention: An introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Quick, M., Li, G., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2018). Crime-general and crime-specific spatial patterns: A multivariate spatial analysis of four crime types at the small-area scale. Journal of Criminal Justice58, 22-32.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Taheri, Z., Nematollahi, Z., & Madani, S. H. (2023). Investigating the Relationship Between the Physical-Social Space of the City and the Sense of Security (Case Study: Qazvin City in 2020). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement13(46), 85-114.
Troy, A., Nunery, A., & Grove, J. M. (2016). The relationship between residential yard management and neighborhood crime: An analysis from Baltimore City and County. Landscape and Urban Planning147, 78-87.
Tseloni, A., Thompson, R., Grove, L., Tilley, N., & Farrell, G. (2017). The effectiveness of burglary security devices. Security Journal30, 646-664.
Vilalta, C., & Fondevila, G. (2024). Unraveling residential burglary trends in urban Mexico: The role of target accessibility, time and regional contexts. Cities145, 104692.
Zarei Kuar, M. (2015), Assessment of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) on human interactions, with a social stability and security approach in residential complexes. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 36(4), 1647– 1661.

  • Receive Date 26 August 2024
  • Revise Date 02 October 2024
  • Accept Date 20 November 2024
  • First Publish Date 30 November 2024
  • Publish Date 30 November 2024