The Relationship between Democracy, Green Energy, Foreign Trade, and Environmental Sustainability in Country Iraq

Hashemi Dizaj, Abdulrahim; Kasser Effendi, Mohammad

The Relationship between Democracy, Green Energy, Foreign Trade, and Environmental Sustainability in Country Iraq

Document Type : Origional Article

Authors

Abdulrahim Hashemi dizaj ¹

Mohammad Kasser Effendi ²

¹ Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

² Master's student, Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objective: Given the increasing importance of environmental issues and the challenges facing countries in achieving sustainable development, a better understanding of the relationship between democratic governance, the use of renewable energy, and trade policies is an inevitable necessity. On the other hand, identifying how these factors affect environmental indicators can help policymakers design optimal strategies to reduce environmental degradation and enhance sustainability. Foreign trade can play a dual role in environmental improvement or degradation. On the one hand, international trade can improve environmental quality through the transfer of clean technologies and environmental innovations; but on the other hand, in the absence of appropriate regulations, it may lead to increased pressure on natural resources and further pollution. Therefore, a simultaneous and integrated examination of these three factors can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the relationships between economic, environmental, and governance policies. Given the importance of the subject, this study attempts to analyze the relationship between these factors and their effects on Iraq's environmental indicators.
Research Method: In this study, Autoregressive Distributed Lag model (ARDL) was used to examine the impact of democracy, green energy, and foreign trade on environmental progress in Iraq from 2006 to 2022. These methods provide the ability to examine the long-term and short-term effects of variables and allow for the analysis of the complex relationships between democracy, green energy, foreign trade, and environmental progress.
Findings and Conclusions: The results show that increased carbon emissions are associated with democracy in Iraq, especially in a situation where economic and political pressures to accelerate economic growth increase energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Also, renewable energies (green energies), although they may have an incremental effect on carbon emissions in the short term, can help reduce carbon emissions and improve environmental quality in the long term. On the other hand, foreign trade has had negative effects on the environment due to Iraq's dependence on fossil energy resources, so Iraq needs green and sustainable trade policies. Also, in this study, the error correction coefficient is -0.3807. This coefficient shows that about 38.07 percent of the short-term imbalance is adjusted in each period and the system moves towards long-term equilibrium

Keywords

Democracy

Green Energy

Foreign Trade

Environment

Sustainability

Iraq

Subjects

Sustainable Regional Development

حسن زاده، محمد، هاشمی دیزج، عبدالرحیم و هاشم علوان، منتظر. (1403) .تاثیر مصرف انرژی و فناوری بر پایداری توسعه اقتصادی کشورعراق. فصلنامه مطالعات توسعه پایدار شهری و منطقه ای، 5(3)275-288 https://www.srds.ir/article_216277.html

محمدی نجمه، سحابی بهرام، حیدری حسن، صادقی سقدل حسین. (1402). بررسی تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی و مصرف انرژی تجدیدپذیر برآلودگی های زیست محیطی در کشورهای در حال توسعه. پژوهشهای اقتصادی (رشد و توسعه پایدار). ۲۳ (۴) :۱-۲۴.

https://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-65432-fa.html

موسی زاده منجیلی، مهسا و نظری، افسانه. (1401). تاثیر تجارت بین الملل بر انتشار دی اکسید کربن مطالعه موردی: کشورهای صادرکننده نفت،یازدهمین کنفرانس بین المللی پژوهش های نوین در مدیریت،اقتصاد،حسابداری و بانکداری.

https://civilica.com/doc/1492696/download/

ناهیدی امیرخیز، محمدرضا؛ رحیم زاده، فرزاد؛ شکوهی‌فرد؛ سیامک. (1399). بررسی رابطه‌ رشد اقتصادی، مصرف انرژی و انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای (مطالعه موردی: کشورهای منتخب سازمان همکاری اسلامی)، فصلنامه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست 22(3): 26-13. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12735.html

نگین تاجی, زریر؛ ایزدخواستی, حجت. (1401). تأثیر تجارت بین‌الملل و سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی بر انتشار دی‌اکسیدکربن در کشورهای عضو گروه D8 با رویکرد داده‌های پانل. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران, 11(44), 161-192. https://jiee.atu.ac.ir/article_15093.html

هاشمی دیزج، عبدالرحیم، حسن زاده، محمد و فلحی عوده، مهدی. (1404).بررسی اثرات استفاده از انرژی خورشیدی بر اشتغال و توسعه پایدار در کشور عراق. فصلنامه مطالعات توسعه پایدار شهری و منطقه‌ای، 7(1)13-27. https://www.srds.ir/article216754.html _

هاشمی دیزج، عبدالرحیم، امیرعلی،فرهنگ و محمدپور،علی(1402). اثرگردشگری و رشد اقتصادی بر انتشار گازهای دی اکسید کربن (با استفاده از رویکرد غیر خطی ARDL)، برنامه ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 12 (44)،33-56. https://tourismpd.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_4374.html

هراتی، جواد، تقی زاده، حجت، امینی، تکتم. (1394). بررسی تاثیر متغیرهای سیاسی و تجاری بر پایداری محیط زیست: کاربرد یک الگوی پانل پویا. سیاست گذاری اقتصادی, 7(14), 129-157. https://ep.yazd.ac.ir/article_715.html

Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Rjoub, H., Kalugina, O., & Hussain, N. (2021). Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2251

Arslan, E. (2023). The influence of government ideology on renewable energy consumption in the European Union countries. Sustainability, 15(20), 14870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014870

Bekun, F. V., Emir, F., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2020). Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 71(2), 136-149. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30476856/

Bernauer, T. and Betzold, C. (2012). Civil society in global environmental governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496511435551

Cevheri, E. (2019). Free trade and democratization: the ominous link in the case of egypt. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 74(4), 1329-1351. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.552640

Clulow, Z. and Reiner, D. (2022). Democracy, economic development and low-carbon energy: when and why does democratization promote energy transition?. Sustainability, 14(20), 13213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013213

Corbett, J. and Lakshmi, V. (2022). Combining design thinking and the socio-technical-ecological systems perspective to understand greenhouse growers’ experiences with energy management solutions.. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.139

Donkor, F. and Mearns, K. (2020). Clean energy solutions and sustainable development, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_123-1

Garlík, B. (2022). Energy sustainability of a cluster of buildings with the application of smart grids and the decentralization of renewable energy sources. Energies, 15(5), 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051649

Gnangnon, S. (2017). Multilateral trade liberalization and government revenue. Journal of Economic Integration, 32(3), 586-614. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2017.32.3.586

Guisinger, A. (2009). Determining trade policy: do voters hold politicians accountable?. International Organization, 63(3), 533-557. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309090183

Hays, J., Ehrlich, S., & Peinhardt, C. (2005). Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: an empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization, 59(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818305050150

Hicks, R., Milner, H., & Tingley, D. (2013). Trade policy, economic interests, and party politics in a developing country: the political economy of cafta-dr. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12057

Hossain, M., Jahid, A., Islam, K., Alsharif, M., & Rahman, F. (2020). Multi-objective optimum design of hybrid renewable energy system for sustainable energy supply to a green cellular networks. Sustainability, 12(9), 3536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093536

Iheonu, C., Muoneke, O., & Agbutun, S. (2023). Investigating the democracy and environmental sustainability nexus in 52 African countries: evidence from two stage least squares and quantile regression. Social Science Quarterly, 104(5), 1006-1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13293

Jebli, M. B., & Youssef, S. B. (2020). The role of renewable energy and agriculture in reducing CO2 emissions: Evidence for North Africa countries. Ecological Indicators, 107, 105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105629

Júnior, H. and Farias, R. (2016). Participation and influence: democratization and the shaping of a public policy in Brazil. Latin American Policy, 7(1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12092

Leonard, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Shapiro, J., Tagliapietra, S., & Wolf, G. (2021). The geopolitics of the European green deal. International Organisations Research Journal, 16(2), 204-235. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-02-10

Li, Q. and Reuveny, R. (2002). Economic globalization and democracy: an empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 33(01), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123403000024

Morais, L. and Freitas, L. (2023). Intermunicipal consortium for sustainable development and innovation of the state of paraíba from the perspective of environmental democracy: an analysis of the organizational discourse. Revista De Direito Da Cidade, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.12957/rdc.2023.66194

Moya, D., Paredes, J., & Kaparaju, P. (2018). Technical, financial, economic and environmental pre-feasibility study of geothermal power plants by retscreen – Ecuador’s case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, 628-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.027

Pei, Y., Chen, H., Liu, Z., & Hu, H. (2023). Does environmental regulation improve residents' health? Evidence from china. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.973499

Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, 371-413.

Prontera, A. and Rubino, A. (2023). Greening energy governance through agencification in the global south: drivers and implications. Regulation & Governance, 18(2), 460-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12521

Sultana, T. (2023). Democracy, green energy, trade, and environmental progress in south asia: advanced quantile regression perspective. Heliyon, 9(10), e20488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20488

Tabsh, Y. and Davidavičienė, V. (2018). The role of innovation and ict’s in the energy management sector.. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2018.12

Wang, X., Guo, M., Koppelaar, R., Dam, K., Triantafyllidis, C., & Shah, N. (2018). A nexus approach for sustainable urban energy-water-waste systems planning and operation. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(5), 3257-3266. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04659

Yahya, F. and Rafiq, M. (2019). Unraveling the contemporary drivers of renewable energy consumption: evidence from regime types. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13178

Yang, H., Zheng, H., Liu, H., & Qun, W. (2019). Nonlinear effects of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency under the constraint of land use carbon emissions: evidence based on a bootstrapping approach and panel threshold model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101679

Zhang, M., Xie, W., & Gao, W. (2022). Have environmental regulations promoted green technological innovation in cities? Evidence from china’s green patents. Plos One, 17(12), e0278902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278902.