Military Site Selection Based on Passive Defense Approach (Integrating RS, GIS, and the Analytic Network Process [ANP] Model) at Ardabil Township

Document Type : Extract article from research project

Authors

1 Ph.D Student, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract
Background and Objective: In this study, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) model was employed within a Geographic Information System (GIS) framework to zone Ardabil County for the purpose of optimal military site selection. The primary objective was to identify and prioritize the most suitable areas for the establishment of military bases, taking into account environmental, climatic, and human-related criteria.
Methodology: This research is of an applied type and has been conducted using a descriptive-analytical method. For this purpose, fourteen important indicators including altitude, slope, slope direction, geology, vegetation, temperature, humidity, soil, distance from road, village, fault, land use, distance from waterway were classified into three main groups (minor, human and environmental). First, using the ANP model and Super Decisions software, the weight of each of them (using a questionnaire and 30 experts and news) was calculated based on pairwise comparisons and internal and external relationships among them. Then, using the GIS environment, spatial information layers related to each indicator were prepared and processed, and the final weight of each layer was integrated using the Raster Calculator tool. In the next step, the final zoning map of the garrison location was divided into five classes from completely suitable to completely unsuitable.
Results and Findings: Results indicated that approximately 30% of the study area falls within the "highly suitable" and "suitable" classes, mainly located in the central and western parts of the county. In contrast, about 30% of the area was found to be "moderately suitable," predominantly covering the northern and central regions. Additionally, 40% of the area was classified as "unsuitable" or "highly unsuitable," with most of these areas situated in the northern and southern parts of the county. The findings of this research can serve as an effective decision-making tool for defense institutions and urban management authorities in the optimal placement of military facilities.

Keywords

Subjects


Bafghizadeh, M., & Sharifi, A. (2023). Optimal location of educational centers using Geographic Information System (GIS) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Educational Planning Studies, 24(12), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2024.25821.2206
Pasban, A. H., & Abedini, M. (2025). Analyzing geomorphological factors influencing optimal location of military garrisons using remote sensing data in a GIS environment (Case study: Khalkhal County, Ardabil Province). Urban and Regional Sustainable Development Studies. Retrieved from https://www.srds.ir/article_218410.html
Roustaei, Sh., Fathi, M. H., Fakhri, S., & Mohammadi-Far, A. (2013). Geomorphological analysis of military site selection (Case study: Western slopes of Sahand Mountain). Human Geography Research, 45(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2013.35253
Zabardast, E. (2010). Application of network analysis process in urban and regional planning. Fine Arts Journal, 2(41), 79–90. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.41.7.4
Sobhani, B., & Malmouki, M. (2025). Optimal agricultural land suitability assessment using remote sensing data and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Case study: Ardabil County). Urban and Regional Sustainable Development Studies, 6(3).
Salavarzadeh, M., & Valipour, P. (2024). Analysis of urban safe shelter location with a passive defense approach (Case study: Ahvaz City). Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, 53(14), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2024.49245.3219
Soltani, M., & Ghaderi-Hajat, M. (2024). Evaluation of military site selection in Kabudarahang County using AHP-Fuzzy and GIS methods. Political Geography Research, https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.2024.83259.1222
Soleimani, R., Valizadeh Kamran, Kh., Mokhtari, D., & Saeedi, A. (2023). The role of climatic elements and factors in military site selection in East Azerbaijan Province with a passive defense approach. Geography and Planning, 27(83), 73–84.
Shamsaei Zafarghandi, F. (2012). Introduction to land-use planning and site selection. Tehran: Imam Hossein Comprehensive University Press, 1st ed.
Sheikhi, H., & Satrabi, F. (2024). Urban shelter site selection based on passive defense principles (Case study: Sanandaj City). Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, 51(14), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2024.48103.3188
Sadegh Amalnik, M., Ansarinejad, A., Ansarinejad, S., & Miri, S. (2010). Identifying causal relationships and ranking critical success and failure factors of information systems implementation projects using a combination of fuzzy ANP and DEMATEL methods. Industrial Engineering, 44(2), 195–212.
Moniri, K., & Khatibi, A. (2024). Zoning Golestan Province for locating military centers with emphasis on passive defense requirements. Political Spatial Planning, 6(3), 178–196. https://psp.modares.ac.ir/article-42-67732-fa.html
Momeni, M. (2002). The role of military and non-military defense in land-use planning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Planning and Territorial Defense. Tehran: Imam Hossein University. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1451204
Javan, Kh., Valizad, L., & Mahdavi, S. (2019). Strategic-military site selection based on natural geographic indicators. Rahbord, 28(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.10283102.1398.28.1.7.8
Imaninasab, M., & Bagheri, A. (2023). Evaluation of site selection indices for the 116th Mechanized Brigade of NEZAJA with a passive defense approach. Defensive Human Capital Management, 3(4), 34–79. https://jdhcm.iamu.ac.ir/article_712892.html
Vojtekova, J., Vojtek, M. 2020. Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a local spatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study from Slovakia. Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 11(1), 131-148. DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2020.1713233
Brooke, S. (2023). Location: An Analysis of Safe Haven Siting in New York City partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Department of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning, Tufts University. https://dl.tufts.edu/concern/pdfs/br86bf68k
Karatas, mumtaz; yakici, ertan & razi, nasuh (2018), Military Facility Location Problems: A Brief Survey, n book: Operations Research for Military Organizations, 9(1), 1-27.
Liu, Chang; Xiao, Bin and Wang, Weijie (2020), Analysis on project management of military barracks in high altitude area, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
Nicoara, Gabriela & pinzariu, sorin (2021), considerations regarding the location and the role of organizational culture in the Romanian military environment, land forces avademy review, 26(1), 55-61.
Ural, Ece & Severcan, yucel can (2022). Assessing user preferences regarding military site regeneration: The case of the Fourth Corps Command in Ankara. Cities, 129, 103- 118.
Yigitcanlar, T. Dur, F. and Dizdaroglu, D. (2015), towards prosperous sustainable cities: A multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach, Habitat International, 45, 36- 46.
Yang, R. Xu, Q. Au, M. H. Yu, Z. Wang, H. & Zhou, L. (2018). Position based cryptography with location privacy: A step for fog computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 799-806. DOI:10.1016/j.future.2017.05.035
Sennaroglu, B., & Celebi, G. V. (2018). A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 160-173.
f military barracks in high altitude area, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/780/5/052013
Nicoara, Gabriela & pinzariu, sorin (2021), considerations regarding the location and the role of organizational culture in the Romanian military environment, land forces avademy review, 26(1), 55-61. DOI: 10.2478/raft-2021-0009
Ural, Ece & Severcan, yucel can (2022). Assessing user preferences regarding military site regeneration: The case of the Fourth Corps Command in Ankara. Cities, 129, 103- 118. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103807
Yigitcanlar, T. Dur, F. and Dizdaroglu, D. (2015), towards prosperous sustainable cities: A multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach, Habitat International, 45, 36- 46. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.033
Mendoza, G., Alan, B., Anderson, G., & Gertner, Z. (2002), Integration Multi criteria Analysis and GIS for land condition Assessment: part II allocation for Military training area, Journal of Geographic Information and decision Analysis, 6(1), 17-30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2570034
White, R., Boult, T.,  & Chow, E. (2014).  A computational asset vulnerability model for the strategic protection of the critical infrastructure, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 7(3), 167-177. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.06.002
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20
Winter 2025
Pages 381-396

  • Receive Date 03 February 2025
  • Revise Date 11 April 2025
  • Accept Date 10 May 2025
  • First Publish Date 13 May 2025
  • Publish Date 23 August 2025