تحلیل تطبیقی شاخص‌ها و عوامل نوشهرسازی در محله‌های ناسار، باغ‌فردوس و گلستان شهر سمنان، رویکردی مبتنی بر سنجش تجربی و اصول نوشهر سازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

3 کارشناس ارشد شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی،دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران ، ایران

چکیده
زمینه و هدف: نوشهر سازی به‌عنوان رویکردی تلفیقی، ارتقای کیفیت زیست شهری، تقویت پیاده‌مداری و توسعه فضاهای عمومی سرزنده را دنبال می‌نماید. بااین‌حال، میزان انطباق بافت‌های شهری با این اصول، غالباً بدون سنجش تجربی و به‌صورت کیفی قضاوت شده است. پژوهش حاضر باهدف سنجش تجربی و تحلیل تطبیقی اصول نوشهرسازی در سه بافت متفاوت از شهر سمنان (بافت تاریخی ناسار، بافت میانه باغ‌فردوس و بافت نوساز گلستان) و اولویت‌بندی راهکارهای مداخله متناسب با هر بافت انجام‌شده است.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش، ازنظر هدف کاربردی و ازنظر روش، توصیفی-تحلیلی می‌باشد. داده‌ها از طریق ۳۶۰ پرسشنامه (۱۲۰ پرسشنامه در هر محله) گردآوری و با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و رگرسیون چندمتغیره در نرم‌افزار SPSS تحلیل‌شده‌اند.
یافته‌ها و نتایج: نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که کفایت نمونه‌گیری در سطح کل داده‌ها مطلوب بوده (KMO=0.782) و ساختار ادراکی از کیفیت محیطی، تابع پیچیدگی بافت کالبدی می‌باشد؛ به‌طوری‌که، در ناسار ۹ عامل (واریانس 87.8%)، در باغ‌فردوس ۸ عامل (83.7%) و در گلستان ۵ عامل (90.3%)، در این رابطه، شناسایی شدند. همچنین تحلیل رگرسیونی مشخص کرد که پیاده‌مداری با بالاترین ضریب اهمیت (β=0.81) در هر سه محله تعیین‌کننده‌ترین اصل نوشهر سازی است و همراه با شاخص "تنوع کاربری"، بالاترین اولویت مداخله را در هر سه بافت به خود اختصاص داده است. در این میان، شاخص‌های "مشارکت مردمی" و "هویت فرهنگی" در هر سه محله، وضعیت نامناسبی داشته و نیازمند تقویت جدی‌ می‌باشند. درنهایت، مقایسه امتیازات نهایی نشان داد که محله گلستان بیشترین و محله ناسار کمترین تطابق را با اصول نوشهر سازی دارند. بر پایه این نتایج، راهکارهای مداخله‌ای متناسب با ویژگی‌های هر بافت تدوین گردید؛ اولویت نخست در محله ناسار، بازآفرینی و مرمت زیرساخت‌های پیاده، در باغ‌فردوس یکپارچه‌سازی نماها و تکمیل شبکه پیاده‌رو و مسیر دوچرخه، و در محله گلستان توسعه فضاهای عمومی فعال و نهادینه‌سازی مشارکت ساکنان، به‌عنوان محورهای اصلی پیشنهاد شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A Comparative Analysis of New Urbanism Indicators and Influencing Factors in the Neighborhoods of Nasar, Bāgh e Ferdows, and Golestān of Semnan: An Empirical Assessment Approach Based on New Urbanism Principles

نویسندگان English

Seyyed Mojtaba Ghazi Mirsaeed 1
Yekta Ghanbarpour 2
Ali Khosravi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Art, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
2 Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Art, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
3 M.Sc. in Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Background and Objective: New Urbanism, as an integrated approach, pursues the enhancement of urban living quality, the reinforcement of walkability, and the development of vibrant public spaces. However, the degree of conformity between urban fabrics and the principles of this approach is frequently judged qualitatively, without empirical assessment. This study aims to empirically assess and comparatively analyze New Urbanism principles across three distinct fabrics of Semnan (the historical fabric of Nasar, the intermediate fabric of Bagh-e Ferdows, and the new-build fabric of Golestan) and to prioritize intervention strategies tailored to each fabric.
Methodology: The research is applied in objective and descriptive-analytical in method. Data were gathered through 360 questionnaires (120 per neighborhood) and analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and multiple regression analysis in SPSS software.
Results and Findings: The results indicate that the sampling adequacy across the overall data was favorable (KMO = 0.782) and that the residents' perceptual structure of environmental quality is a function of the physical complexity of the fabric. Specifically, 9 factors (explaining 87.8% of the variance) were identified for the traditional fabric of Nasar, 8 factors (83.7%) for the intermediate fabric of Bagh-Ferdous, and 5 factors (90.3%) for the modern fabric of Golestan. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed that walkability, with the highest coefficient of importance (β = 0.81), is the most decisive principle of New Urbanism across all three neighborhoods, and along with the "land-use diversity" index, it holds the highest priority for intervention in all three fabrics. Meanwhile, the indices of "public participation" and "cultural identity" exhibited poor status across all neighborhoods, necessitating significant reinforcement. Finally, a comparison of the final scores showed that the Golestan neighborhood has the highest and the Nasar neighborhood has the lowest alignment with the principles of New Urbanism. Based on these findings, tailored intervention strategies were formulated; accordingly, the primary priorities were identified as the regeneration and restoration of pedestrian infrastructure in Nasar, the unification of facades and the completion of the pedestrian and bicycle network in Bagh-Ferdous, and the development of active public spaces and the institutionalization of resident participation in Golestan.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

New Urbanism
Walkability
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
Regression Analysis
Semnan
1.   Armanshahr Consulting Engineers. (2015). Semnan master plan (Vols. 1–6). General Directorate of Roads and Urban Development of Semnan Province (In Persian).
2.   Bahrami, Y., Bahri Angord, N., Ghaderi Motlagh, I., & Hosseini, S. A. (2017). Physical evaluation of newly founded urban neighborhoods using new urbanism principles (Case: Yaghchian neighborhood of Tabriz). Geographical Planning of Space, 7 (25), 21-36. (In Persian). https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_54238.html
3.   Berrigan, D., Dodd, K., Troiano, R. P., Reeve, B. B., & Ballard-Barbash, R. (2006). Physical Activity and Acculturation Among Adult Hispanics in the United States. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77(2), 147–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599349
4.   Blasingame Custer, J. (2007). New Urbanism and Euclidian Zoning: Can They Co-Exist? Land Use Clinic, University of Georgia School of Law,1–6. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/landuse/17
5.   Cai, J., Li, X., Liu, L., Chen, Y., Wang, X., & Lu, S. (2021). Coupling and coordinated development of new urbanization and agro-ecological environment in China. Science of The Total Environment, 776, 145837. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.145837
6.   Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2006). Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail housing mixing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 475–490. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360608976767
7.   Cysek-Pawlak, M. M., & Pabich, M. (2021). Walkability–the New Urbanism principle for urban regeneration. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 14(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1834435
8.   Cysek-Pawlak, M., Krzysztofik, S., & Makowski, A. (2022). Urban regeneration and urban resilience planning through connectivity: The importance of this principle of new urbanism. European Spatial Research and Policy, 29(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.29.1.06.
9.   Esmaeili, M., & Moshiri Tayebi Nejad, S. R. (2024). The role of urban zones in the development of Arak City. Quarterly Journal of Sustainable Urban and Regional Development Studies(JSURDS), 5(2), 157–180. https://www.srds.ir/article_200885.html?lang=en
10.           Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
11.           Franco-Torres, M., Rogers, B. C., & Harder, R. (2021). Articulating the new urban water paradigm. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(23), 2777–2823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1803686
12.           Garde, A. (2020). New urbanism: Past, present, and future. Urban Planning, 5(4), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478
13.           Golshahi, M., Sargolzaei, S., & Ghazi, R. (2021). Sustainable regeneration of problematic neighborhoods of border metropolises with an emphasis on new urbanism and its promotion strategies: A case study of Babaeian Neighborhood, Zahedan. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 8 (29), 125–148. (In Persian).https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2021.3443
14.           Habibi, S. M., Tahsildar, M., & Pourmohammadreza, N. (2011). A commentary on the principles and rules of vernacular urban planning in relation to contemporary urban planning theories. Housing and Rural Environment, 30 (135), 3–22. SID. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/186162/fa
15.           Hall, C. M., & Ram, Y. (2018). Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.018
16.           Izadnejad, S., & Maleki, S. (2025). Investigating and evaluating citizens' satisfaction and perception of the pedestrian-oriented principle of New Urbanism in Ahvaz City. Quarterly Journal of Sustainable Urban and Regional Development Studies(JSURDS),, 6(1), 432–451.https://www.srds.ir/article_242378.html?lang=en
17.           Keith, M., Birch, E., Buchoud, N. J., Cardama, M., Cobbett, W., Cohen, M., ... & van der Pütten, M. (2023). A new urban narrative for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 6(2), 115–11.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00979-5
18.           Khalili, A., Heidarzadeh, E., & Sedaghatnia, S. (2015). Measuring the new principles of urbanism approach and presenting action solutions in neighborhoods scale, case study: The Babolsar coastal township neighborhoods. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 7 (13), 275–292. (In Persian).  https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_33452.html
19.           Koohsari, M. J., Sugiyama, T., Hanibuchi, T., Shibata, A., Ishii, K., Liao, Y., & Oka, K. (2018). Validity of Walk Score® as a measure of neighborhood walkability in Japan. Preventive Medicine Reports, 9, 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.001
20.           Latifi, G., & Safari Chabak, N. (2014). Re-creating the concept of neighborhood in Iranian-Islamic cities based on the principles of New Urbanism. Urban Studies Quarterly, 2(8), 3–12. (In Persian). https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_6418.html
21.           Maleki, S., & Moradi, H. (2023). Evaluation of the indicators related to New Urbanism in the sustainability of the urban areas of Ilam. Journal of Urban Structure & Function Studies, 10(35), 191–218. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2023.23942.2279
22.           Mehaffy, M. W., & Haas, T. (2020). New Urbanism in the New Urban Agenda: Threads of an unfinished reformation. Urban Planning, 5(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3371
23.           Rahimi, B., Masoumi, M. T., & Nazmfar, H. (2022). A comparative study based on the principles of neo-urbanism in urban neighborhoods: A case study of Rasht metropolis. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning Studies, 17 (3), 793–809. (In Persian). https://search.isc.ac/dl/search/defaultta.aspx?DTC=8&DC=1321016
24.           Rahnama, M. R., Roshani, P., & Afshari, M. (2014). Qualitative promotion of modern urban neighborhoods by applying the New Urbanism approach (Case study: Azadshahr District of Mashhad. Journal of Geography and Urban Development, (3), 27–45. (In Persian).  http://noo.rs/3ePXn
25.           Rogers, D., & Gibson, C. (2021). Unsolicited urbanism: Development monopolies, regulatory-technical fixes and planning-as-deal-making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20952421
26.           Shuaijin. (2021). The development of the new urbanism theory and reflections on its application at florida’s seaside. Journal of Architectural Research and Development, 5(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.26689/jard.v5i4.2497
27.           Thompson, M. (2021). What’s so new about New Municipalism? Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520909480

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 20 شهریور 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 21 شهریور 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 اسفند 1405