کاربرد شاخص‌های چند بعدی(افقی و عمودی) در بررسی کیفیت زندگی شهری(مطالعه موردی: شهر بیرجند)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده
زمینه و هدف: کیفیت زندگی مقوله­ای چند بعدی و شامل ابعاد افقی (عینی و ذهنی) و عمودی است و جنبه­های متفاوتی از حیات شهروندان را تحت تاثیر قرار می­دهد. به همین دلیل، نمی­توان آن را به یک یا چند شاخص خاص، محدود کرد. مدنظر قرار دادن ابعاد عینی و ذهنی(افقی) و عمودی مقوله کیفیت زندگی، باعث می شود مسئولان از این طریق قادر باشند با پیگیری تغییرات در جنبه­های مختلف زندگی و انتخاب توسعه مطلوب شهر، رضایتمندی ساکنین را تامین و زمینه­هایی که شهروندان به مشارکت در آن حوزه­ها راغب هستند، فراهم آورند.
روش بررسی: در پژوهش حاضرسعی شده­است با بهره­گیری از روش توصیفی- تحلیلی، وضعیت کیفیت زندگی در سطح شهر بیرجند که در سال­های اخیر به عنوان مرکز استان خراسان جنوبی انتخاب شده­است مورد ارزیابی قرارگیرد. با این هدف، نمونه­ای به حجم 271 خانوار از مناطق مختلف شهر انتخاب و اطلاعات به طریق میدانی و نظرسنجی گردآوری شد. در نهایت، اطلاعات گردآوری شده با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و روش­های آماری، به خصوص همبستگی و رگرسیون مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرارگرفت.
یافته ها و نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد که به طورکلی وضعیت کیفیت زندگی در ابعاد افقی و عمودی در کل شهر از حد متوسط پایین­تر می­باشد. با این وجود، مناطق شمالی وضعیت بسیار بدتر و نامناسب­تری از مناطق جنوبی داشته و ضروری است که مسئولان شهر نه تنها به ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در کل سطح شهر اقدام نمایند، بلکه توجه اساسی­تری به مناطق جنوبی داشته­باشند. این پژوهش می­تواند درک بهتری از نابرابری‌ها در کیفیت زندگی شهری ارائه داده و مبنای علمی مناسبی را برای سیاست‌گذاری­های شهری بر اساس تنوع موجود و مبتنی بر نگاهی فراگیر ارائه ‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigating indicators of the quality of urban life (Case study: Birjand city)

نویسنده English

Rostam Saberifar
Associate Professor, Department of Urban and Geography, Faculty of Social Science, University of Payam e Noor, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Multidimensional urban quality of Life encompasses horizontal dimensions (objective and subjective dimensions) and vertical dimensions (themes), which include relevant aspects of the living conditions that should be objectively and subjectively assessed. They took into consideration the objective, mental and vertical and horizontal dimensions of the quality of life category, which makes the officials would be able to not only provide their satisfactory at the highest level, but also step positively forward to determining reasons of citizens’ dissatisfactory and establish infrastructures that citizens are interested to, through tracking changes of all aspects of quality of life and choosing proper development of the city.
Methods and Material: The following study seek to survey the condition of quality of life of Birjand city that is recently assigned as the center of South Khorasan, applying descriptive – analytic method. Therefore, a sample of 271 households are selected from different restricts of the city and data are collected through field survey and using questionnaire. Finally, the collected data has been analyzed by statistics methods and related software applications.
Results and Discussion: The results suggest that the condition of quality of life quality mainly was lower than moderate level, from subjective and objective aspects throughout the whole city. Nevertheless, northern districts suffer much worse and improper condition rather than southern districts; and it is essentially needed that officials, not only implement to improve quality of life within the city, but also take a deeper care to northern districts which are taken more prioritization.
Conclusion:This study tried to contribute to our understanding of the disparities in urban QOL, and provide a scientific basis for urban policies that achieve diversity and inclusiveness.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

quality of life
satisfactory
need assessment
Birjand City
Becker, B. j. (2000). Handbook of Applied Multivariable Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. San Diego: Academic Press.
Bereton F. (2008). Assembling Life Quality. Soc Indic Res, 88, 268-281.
Bramston, P., Pretty, G., & Chipuer, H. (2002). Unravelling subjective quality of life: An investigation of individual and community determinats. Social Indicator Research, 59, 261-274.
Costanza, R. (2007). Quality of Life: An Approach Integration Opportunities, Human Needs, and Subjective Well-Being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267-276.
Das, D. (2008). Urban Quality of Life: A Case Study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88, 297-310.
Epley, D., & Menon, M. (2008). A Method of Assembling Cross-sectional Indicators into a Community Quality of Life. Soc Indic Res, 88, 281-296.
Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Res. Dev. Disabil, 16, 51–74.
Foo, A. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapor (1997-1998), Habitat International, 24, 31-49.
Grayson, L., & Young, K. (1994). Quality of Life in Cities: An Overview and Guide to the Literature. London: The British Library.
Gupta, C. (2024). Top 10 wealthiest cities in the world in 2024https://indianexpress.com/profile/author/cherry-gupta/
Hagerty, R. (2001). Quality of Life in Rural Area. New York: Institue of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Ibrahim, M., & Chung, W. (2003). Quality of life residents living near industrial estates in Singapore. Social Indicator Research, 61, 203-225.
Karki, S. (2021). Sustainable Livelihood Framework: Monitoring and Evaluation. nt. J. Soc. Sc. Manage, 8(1), 266-271.
Kharazmi, S. (2004). Quality of life and requirements of the digital age in Iran. World of Economics, 13(2), 11-13. (in Persian)
Kurdzanganeh, J. (2006). Investigating the quality of life related to the elderly and the factors affecting it. Master's thesis in sociology. Faculty of Social Sciences. University of Tehran. (in Persian)
Lee, Y.j. (2008). Subjective quality  of  life measurement in Taipei. Bulidin and Environment, 43, 1205-1215.
Massam, B. H. (2002). Quality of Life Public Planning and Private Living. Progress in Planning, 58, 141-227.
Mccrea, R. (2006). Testing  a moderat  model  of satisfaction with urban living guising data for brisbane-south east queesland. Social Indicators Research, 72, 121–152.
Mehdizadeh, J. (2003). Strategic planning of urban development, recent global experiences and its position in Iran. Tehran: Architecture and Urban Planning Research Center of Iran. (in Persian)
Miles, S. (1985). Assesment Life Quality. Social Indicators Research, 72, 65–77.
Ministry of Defense, Geographical Department of the Army. (1992). Geographical culture of the settlements of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Defense. (in Persian)
Moradi, M. (1992). Effective factors in the physical development of Birjand. Master's thesis in geography. Faculty of Earth Sciences. Shahid Beheshti University. (in Persian)
Murgas, F., & Klobučník, M. (2018). Quality of life in the city, quality of urban life or well-being in the city: Conceptualization and case study. Sciendo, 37(2), 183–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-016
Nef, D.P., Nef, S., & Kruetli, P. (2023). Putting people back at the center of livelihood vulnerability analysis. SN Soc Sci, 3(184), 75-86.
Ochoa-Rico, M.S., Río, J.A.Jd., & Romero-Subia, J.F. (2024). Study of Citizen Satisfaction in Rural Versus Urban Areas in Public Services: Perspective of a Multi-group Analysis. Soc Indic Res, 171, 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03242-2
Omidi, R. (2007). Quality of life in development programs in Iran. Master's thesis in sociology. Faculty of Social Sciences. University of Tehran. (in Persian)
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Wellbeing –A Social Geographical Perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 33-49.
Pal, A. K., & Kumar, U.C. (2005). Quality of Life Concept for the Evaluation of Societal Development of Rural Community in West Bangal, India. Rural Development, 15, 49-61.
Parse, R.R. (1994). Quality of Life: Sciencing and Living, the Art of Human Becoming. Nursing Science Quayerly, 17, 1-21.
Philips, D. (2006). Quality of Life Concept, Policy and Practice. London: Routlege.
Rizwani Mohammadreza, and Mansourian, Hossein. (2008). Measuring the quality of life by examining indicators and models and presenting a proposed model for rural areas. Village and Development, 11(3), 1-26. (in Persian)
Rizwani, M., Shakiba, A., & Mansourian, H. (2007). Assessing the quality of life in rural areas, Social Welfare Quarterly, 8(31), 11-23. (in Persian)
Saberifar, R. (2011). Studying the phenomenon of marginal living in Birjand city. Research project of Payam Noor University, South Khorasan province. (in Persian)
Saeedi, N., Saeedi, A., & Ebadi-Fardazer, F. (2024). The status of lifestyle and quality of life related to health in western Iran. Journal of Monitoring, 23(3), 427-417. (in Persian)
Saif-aldini, F. (2002). Vocabulary of urban and regional planning. Second edition. Shiraz: Shiraz University Press. (in Persian)
Santo, R. (2007). Quality Life, Unlishing the Potential of Urban Growth. New York: UNFPA.
Smith, W. (1973). The art and Architecture. New Haven: Yale University.
Takano, T., Morita, H., Nakamura, H., & Togawa, T. (2023). Evaluating the quality of life for sustainable. urban development, 142, 45-61.
Turksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and Limitations for the Measurement of the Quality of Life in Urban Areas. Social Indicators Research, 53,163–1.
Wesz, J., Gomes Miron, L., Delsante, I., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2023). Urban Quality of Life: A Systematic Literature Review. Urban Sci., 7(2), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7020056
Winsted, G. (1985). Measurement of the Quality of Life. Social Indicator Research, 79, 11-21.
Wish, S. (1986). Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 72,78–97.
Zebardast, E. (2009). The housing domain of quality of life and life satisfaction in spontaneous settelments on the Tehran metropolitan frings. Social Indicator Research, 90, 307-324.

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 01 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 02 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 02 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 شهریور 1403